Subject	Thanks Scott. That's quite useful info.
Posted by	darkmann on March 27, 2008 at 9:33 AM
	This message has been viewed 61 times.
In Reply To	17x10 rear is no problem, but I think is a relatively posted by Scotts94z32 on March 26, 2008 at 11:43 PM
Message	No particular reason I suggested 17x9.5 up front. I know x10 will not fit, so chose the next best. I'd go 18s but I have this feeling that without lowering, the car would stand too tall with 18s, and I'm really not interested in lowering yet.
Follow Ups	How wide can one go with 17 inchers? - darkmann 23:03:17 03/26/08 17x10 rear is no problem, but I think is a relatively - Scotts94z32 23:43:45 03/26/08 Thanks Scott. That's quite useful info. - darkmann 09:33:58 03/27/08 read the post a page down... - SkiFly01 23:46:30 03/26/08 This vehicle makes frequent stops! (n/m) - BradZ (FL) 09:21:29 03/27/08 Re: read the post a page down... - darkmann 09:39:39 03/27/08 im runngin 17x9 with 275's no problems so far. (n/m) - Halo Z 00:33:16 03/27/08 About to be the same with the new rear tires mounted. (n/m) - AbsolutZ (OH) 07:14:06 03/27/08 For the rear 17x10 go with around a +44 offset - na300zx (OH) 05:43:20 03/27/08 2nd... - BradZ (FL) 09:50:29 03/27/08 For the look he is going for - na300zx (OH) 10:56:00 03/27/08 Agreed. It isn't ideal. (n/m) - BradZ (FL) 10:58:26 03/27/08 If you have a TT you'll need to grind down the HiCAS - BigTDogg (MA) 12:16:59 03/27/08
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.